RDNH UDRP

UDRP

Why the ekart.com UDRP decision was correctly decided

WIPO panelist Steven A. Maier was the panelist who decided the UDRP complain inInstakart Services Private Limited v. Ozguc Bayraktar, RS DANISMANLIKCase No. D2024-4345 Key Reasons why the ekart.com UDRP decision was correctly decided: 1. Chronological Impossibility:– Domain registered: December 29, 1999– Complainant’s operations began: 2009– Trademark registrations: November 7, 2012– Impossible for Respondent to […]

UDRP

Analysis of the WHOLESALESUITE.COM UDRP Decision

The recent WIPO UDRP decision on the domain provides some important lessons for trademark owners filing cybersquatting complaints. The Panel correctly found that the domain name was not registered in bad faith and that the complaint should not have been brought. Wrongly Found that Trademarks Identical or Confusingly Similar to wholesalesuite.com The Panel incorrectly found

UDRP

wholesalesuite.com UDRP Decisions

ADR Forum Claim Number: FA2402002084506 Rymera Web Co Pty Ltd v. Brian Harris wholesalesuite.com UDRP Decision Summary The complainant, Rymera Web Co, owns US trademark registrations for WHOLESALE SUITE for software related to e-commerce websites. The disputed domain name was <wholesalesuite.com>. The panel found the domain name identical to the complainant’s trademark. However, the panel denied the

Scroll to Top